Daily Archives: February 18, 2009

Mystery in Muddy York!

ago

By Sandra Pate

If you haven’t heard yet, there is a fascinating mystery unfolding at the Grange House, which is now attached to our newly revamped AGO. The house was built for the Boultons, circa 1817, a wealthy family with eight children and ten servants. Over the years, it has been beautifully restored and is now a National Historic Site, the oldest remaining brick house in Toronto. In 1910, it was donated to the City of Toronto and became our first art gallery.

Just last year, the AGO received a unique gift from a Boston gentleman who is a descendent of a long serving butler at The Grange, Henry Whyte. Apparently Henry kept a diary of sorts, including a hand drawn map of the home and the gardens – complete with several areas dated and marked with an ‘X’!

After analysis and cross-referencing, these marked locations were excavated, revealing various artifacts made of beeswax. It seems that the butler, Henry, had observed a young maid, Mary O’Shea, creating and hiding wax globules throughout the property, during her almost thirty years of service in the Grange home. Henry aptly nicknamed her ‘Amber’, and kept a record of her ‘wax creations’ in his diary and on his map.

Mary O’Shea (‘Amber’) was an Irish immigrant who arrived in Canada in 1828, at the young age of seventeen, and was taken on probation by the Boultons as their third maid. Soon after she began her maid service, she started to make molded wax items, in secret, often inserting an object or two into their centre. These items together have created a ‘time capsule’ of the Grange House: a peek into the past of a prominent family, from the perspective of their maid. One of Mary’s creations is a ball of beeswax approximately 4” in diameter, containing a tiny porcelain baby doll – perhaps a discarded toy from one of the daughters? Another is a very large, long triangular wax form, embedded in the cellar floor, enclosing a large bone from a deer and a red braid of human hair!

And the most amazing discovery:  behind a false wall, there is a small chamber containing a workshop! Inside are fabric bundles hanging above a worktable laden with various pieces of beeswax both raw and sculpted. The whole workspace – including a small, very old wooden door (believed to be the original entryway) – was hidden from view behind a hastily erected plaster wall, and only discovered recently during renovation work in the cellar.

Mary and Henry, through the butler’s diary and map, have left us an amazing glimpse into the history of the Grange, immigration to Canada and the life of the wealthy and the poor in the early days of York. See it all for yourself by touring the Grange House. The tours are free, every hour on the half hour, during the regular hours of the AGO. Just sign up in the tour book in the main hall of the Grange, and prepare to take a fascinating 45 minute trip into Muddy York’s mysterious past.

Sandra Pate is a Broker with Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd./JOHNSTON & DANIEL DIVISION. Sandra’s website is located at www.postcardhomes.com.

Mortgage Fraud – A Hot Topic

By: Valerie Logaridis

Few people are aware of the possibility of fraud against their home. But people with substantial equity in their homes or who spend more time out of their home become easy prey for sophisticated fraudsters who have the means to perpetrate this kind of crime.

Susan Lawrence is a Toronto victim of real estate fraud. Her home was mortgaged for almost $300,000 by fraudsters who forged her signature and walked away with the money early in 2005. She says, “Until I was defrauded, I was not aware that if I had title insurance, I would have been protected.”

The Ontario government plans to introduce legislation this fall to enhance existing protection from real estate fraud. If passed, the proposed legislation would ensure that ownership of a property couldn’t be lost as a result of the registration of a falsified mortgage, fraudulent sale or a counterfeit power of attorney. Instead, innocent homeowners will have their titles restored to them and the fraudulent document will be nullified, the government says.

Minister of Government Services Gerry Phillips said, “While individual cases are of concern to me and are upsetting, I can reassure homeowners that real estate fraud is limited in comparison to the more than two million real estate transactions that occur each year in this province. However, we will continue to build on today’s proposals because even one case of fraud is too many.”

Title insurance is one inexpensive way that homeowners can protect themselves from mortgage fraud.

Fraud protection

For many buyers, the fraud coverage provided by title insurance is particularly reassuring. Title insurance can protect homeowners if they are the victim of fraud, and may also pay the costs involved in defending their ownership in the property and restoring their title to the home.

Title insurance provides protection against title-related problems; it is not home warranty insurance, and will not protect homebuyers if the fridge breaks down or the furnace gets old. As with any insurance purchase, the homebuyer should consult the policy for full details of the actual terms and conditions and seek advice from a real estate lawyer. A real estate lawyer can help a buyer or a homeowner sort out the various protections offered by different title insurance companies in order to get an idea of which risks are covered and which are excluded.

One company that sells title insurance, commissioned a survey that found nearly half of homeowners over the age of 45 said they do not have title insurance or are unaware if they do. The survey also found that 63 per cent of Canadian homeowners without title protection had “absolutely no understanding of title insurance – a number that rose to 66 per cent for those over the age of 60,” says the company.

Court of Appeal Decision Protects the Homeowner-victim

In February, the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed a decision that held defrauded home owners on the hook for a fraudulent sale. In a unanimous 5-0 ruling, the court’s decision said that banks and lending institutions had “to be vigilant when making mortgages, and places the burden of fraud on the party that has the opportunity to avoid it – rather than on the innocent homeowner who played no role in the perpetration of the fraud.”

In this Court of Appeal decision, Lawrence v. Maple Trust Company, the homeowner won, was able to keep her home, and was not required to repay the illegally-obtained mortgage.

The Court of Appeal decision is a reversal of a lower court decision made in the fall of 2005, which held that fraudulent mortgages are binding once registered.

Valerie Logaridis is a Sales Representative with Royal LePage R.E.S./JOHNSTON & DANIEL DIVISION. Val is a regular blogger with Muddy York.