By Sandra Foster
The topic of real estate is a hot one in both Canada and the US, for entirely different reasons. As someone who has lived in each country for more than 20 years, and owned homes in both, I am fascinated by the differences, and dismayed by the ongoing problems in America. I moved from Toronto to California in the late 1980s. Prior to the move, I owned three homes over a period of ten years, but becoming a first time home owner in Canada was difficult. I bought my first home thanks to subsidies from the builder, and a balloon loan. I bought my second home, a wonderful condominium across the ravine from the Old Mill Restaurant, only because I was able to put down 50% – $120,000 hard earned dollars.
Buying a home in California was significantly easier – at least it was in 1988. But I see now how the industry, and along with the industry, millions of home owners, have managed to get themselves in such a horrible mess. The amount of down payment needed was much less, and my income leverage much more. Since mortgage interest is tax deductible, my ability to pay was judged not only on earnings, down payment and assets, but also by the tax implication. I was actually able to purchase a much more expensive home in California than I could afford in Toronto, on a similar gross income. I still own that home in California, mostly because unemployment is over 10%, prices are depressed, and I’m lucky enough to own a delightful century home in a high value neighborhood, Los Gatos – renting to premium tenants has so far proved easy.
I’m back in Toronto again, and I see that it’s much easier to buy one’s first home – that’s a good thing. But I respect the job that the Canadian government and financial institutions have done, and continue to do, to keep a little sanity in the process. Financing and refinancing to take out equity in the US were all too easy. Qualification for loans was much less stringent. People were comfortable taking more risks. The price the country is now paying in both financial and personal terms is not pleasant to watch.
While I have dual citizenship, I’m Canadian at heart. I like our less aggressive stance to finances. I approve of more government oversight. Our real estate market affirms that our more conservative approach is better in the long run. I have many close friends, however, back in the US and I hope for their sakes and for our overall long term economic outlook that the American market and the American people recover, and get back to business, albeit hopefully a little more cautious.
I do miss some things about California – my previous career was in high tech, so adoption of the latest and greatest tools was something I enjoyed and leveraged. Interestingly, homes often listed and sold on craigslist. In my neighborhood, for example, the most expensive home sold twice from a craigslist post…the first time to a Google millionaire, for $1.8m, in one day. When he and his family decided to move back east, the house went back on craigslist again, and sold in two days. So far, I haven’t seen craigslist or other public networks as having that kind of influence in the Toronto marketplace. My personal goal to be paperless was solidly in effect while I lived in California. I’m finding it harder here, for a variety of reasons. I’m optimistic, however, that this goal is achievable not only personally but also professionally, and I look forward to computer-based offer presentations, digital signatures, and other innovations over time. I’d love to start a dialog with other agents about this.
Sandra Foster is a Sales Representative with Royal LePage/Johnston & Daniel Division and a regular contributor to the Muddy York Real Estate Blog.
Empty nest syndrome and the homeowner
By Heather Rose
Empty nest syndrome is a term that describes the general sadness and depression that affects parents and households when the kids grow up, leave home and go off to college, university or just to live on their own. It’s a very real situation that can easily be felt every moment of the day when a once-full house is no longer brimming with the bustle of kids moving through it. However, just because they’re gone doesn’t mean you have to be left behind.
An empty nest is an opportunity for many homeowners to choose to move into a much smaller home. A large home doesn’t always scream luxury, and so a smaller home should not necessarily be considered less than what you’ve already got. A smaller home merely a more appropriate size and may suit your lifestyle that much more. You are also no longer need to be near family-friendly spaces or schools for the kids, allotting you the freedom to consider neighbourhoods or areas of the city you never considered before. Sometimes, a smaller home might also mean a smaller price tag, and the money gained from the sale of your current home can provide you with an opportunity to travel, buy a beach house or invest in a cottage.
A smaller home may be easier for empty nesters to manage as well. For example, a home with five bedrooms is no longer necessary for your situation and it might be far more space than you’ll ever use – or be able to maintain – now that there’s far fewer people in the house. Instead, consider the benefits a three bedroom home that has just enough space for you to have a guest bedroom for when the kids come back to visit along with a stylish study or quiet library.
Many parents who feel left behind can now find the time to travel or finally get to things they were unable to do before, as well as discover new hobbies and activities to enjoy as a couple. An empty nest doesn’t have to leave you with a house that feels too cold and not lived in, and it can serve as the perfect excuse to find a smaller house that will quickly become a home.
Heather Rose is a Toronto based Journalist, who is a regular contributor to the Muddy York Real Estate Blog. Heather website is located at heatherroseportfolio.squarespace.com.
→ Leave a comment
Posted in Commentary
Tagged Depression, Empty Nest Syndrome, Opportunity, Sadness