Category Archives: Mortgage Information

Bank of Canada Keeps Interest Rates Steady

The Bank of Canada has made its ninth announcement (on October 25th) in a row where it has decided to keep its rate at 1.25 per cent.

According to the Canadian Real Estate Association’s latest press release on the matter:

“Along with the return of more robust economic activity being pushed further out into the future, core inflation is now expected to remain below the Bank’s 2% target until the end of 2013. What it all means is that interest rates will likely be on hold even longer. Expectations as to how long it would be before the Bank hikes rates had previously centred around the fall of 2012, although it will now more likely be into 2013 before the Bank begins to tighten monetary policy from current levels.”

In addition, the Bank of Canada lowered its economic forecast for Canada, revising predicted economic growth to be only 2.1 per cent as opposed to the previously projected 2.8 per cent in July for 2011, and down to 1.9 per cent from 2.6 per cent for 2012. The economic outlook for growth for 2013 on the other hand, was upgraded from 2.1 per cent to 2.9 per cent.

The Canadian Real Estate Association also added, “As of October 25, 2011, the advertised five-year lending rate stood at 5.29 per cent. This is down 0.1 percentage points from 5.39 per cent on September 7, when the Bank made its last policy interest rate announcement.”

The next announcement will be December 6, 2011.

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

A Surprising New Mortgage That Pays You to Go Green

By Dave Larock

Businesses are always looking to cash in on consumer trends, and in today’s world the trend towards greener, more sustainable living is the mother of them all. Until now, Canadian mortgage lenders have made half-hearted attempts to capitalize on the green movement by rebranding their existing products with green-sounding names and offering to donate to green causes if you agree to pay a higher interest rate. Not surprisingly, these attempts at green washing have been met with consumer indifference, because despite what the mortgage marketing departments at our major banks must think, we can actually add and subtract.

In today’s post I’ll show you what a typical “green” mortgage from a major bank looks like and then I’ll introduce you to what is, in my opinion, Canada’s first and only legitimately green mortgage (because it rewards you with a better rate for being green).

First, let’s look at a standard offer from a Big Five bank. It usually includes a free handbook on how to green-up your home and comes with a rebate of $100 to $150 for a home energy audit, provided it is done shortly after you move in. The rate offered is always worse than market and I guess the hope is that you’ll be so gung ho for the green part of the mortgage you won’t pay attention to how much it’s actually costing you.

Here is a current example of a Big Five bank’s green offer:

  • Bank offers you 1% off of their posted rate (that’s a five-year fixed rate at 4.39% as of Aug 24, 2011)
  • In return you qualify to receive up to 1% of your mortgage back, in the form of rebates, if you buy approved energy efficient items for your home.
  • Bank donates $100 to a good cause.
  • Now let’s assume that you took this offer and borrowed $300,000, amortized over 25 years. At 4.39% (or anything close to that) you’d be massively overpaying since you could call any independent mortgage broker on the internet and get 3.59% today. Over the next five years, using these comparative rates, your green mortgage would cost you about $8,000 in extra interest, and in return you would get a potential rebate of $3,000 (plus a handbook, I’m sure).

In case you were wondering, the fine print for this offer says that if you receive a discount of greater than 1% off of the posted rate you are not eligible for any rebates, so this isn’t the usual case of a bank advertising a high rate and then making you haggle for a discount.

If this bank really cares about the environment then why do they waste all that paper and ink promoting such a terrible offer? Frankly, it’s an insult to greenies everywhere – just because we care about the environment doesn’t mean we can’t use a calculator.

That brings us to a new green mortgage offer which is only available through a very select group of independent mortgage planners. I now have a lender that will discount its already competitive five-year rate of 3.44% down another 10 basis points to 3.34% (with reasonable terms and conditions) provided that you meet the following criteria:

If you are purchasing a home, it must have one of the following: a mid- or high-efficiency furnace, an alternative energy source (i.e. solar panels), a new water heater, or Energy Star™ rated appliances with a combined value of at least $1,000. Alternatively, if your home has been rated with an energy efficiency level of 80 or higher, you will also be eligible (this rating is based on the EnerGuide rating system used by Natural Resources Canada).

If you are refinancing your existing mortgage, you must do one of the following: spend at least $1,000 of the refinance proceeds on new windows and/or doors, a mid- or high-efficiency furnace, a new water heater, alternative energy sources (i.e. solar panels), Energy Star™ rated appliances, or anything else that could reasonably be assumed to improve your home’s energy efficiency (i.e. reinsulating the attic). You are also eligible if you use at least $1,000 of the refinance proceeds to purchase or refinance a loan on a hybrid or electric vehicle.

As a kicker, the lender will donate $100 to Evergreen Canada for every mortgage transaction that is completed under this program.

Now I call that a real green mortgage because it actually saves you money for either buying a house that is environmentally efficient, or refinancing your current mortgage and using part of the proceeds to green up your home or car. (No word yet on whether this offer comes with a handbook.)

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms. www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

Canadian Real Estate Buyers Keeping Markets Hot

According to this Toronto Star article, Canadian home buyers have been keeping the Canadian real estate market hot these past few weeks.

The housing market is expected to be much more stable compared to other markets and other locations in the coming months, according to what the Canadian Real Estate Association’s chief economist, Gregory Klump, told the Star.

“We anticipate that, going forward, the housing market in Canada is going to be an oasis of stability compared to what is expected to be further volatility in financial markets,” he said.

The article follows a young financial consultant who is looking to buy his first home, along with the worries and fears he’s considered entertaining while jumping into the Canadian real estate market.

Despite naysayers and critics, the real estate market in Canada is stable and low interest rates are encouraging more and more home buyers, even first time home buyers.

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

Large Mortgage Loans and the Sliding Scales Used to Underwrite Them

By Dave Larock

For a lender, bigger is not always better.

The larger a mortgage gets, the greater the lender’s potential loss if the borrower defaults.

The higher the purchase price of a house, the fewer potential buyers it has, making it more vulnerable to market corrections and more difficult to unload if it has to be seized and sold.

In the world of lending, where return of capital is more important than return on capital, large mortgage loans come with increased risk, and as such, are subject to greater scrutiny.

To offset this increased risk, lenders will use some variation of a sliding scale to reduce a loan in proportion to a property’s value when it exceeds a certain dollar amount. Today’s post will explain how these sliding scales work and will offer some suggestions to help ensure that you get the full bang you deserve for your higher-than-average-size mortgage buck.

Definition of a large loan: If you live near a major urban centre, lenders consider a mortgage in the $750,000 range to be a large loan and if you need to borrow more than that, they will invoke a sliding scale to limit their potential loss. (If you live in a rural setting, a mortgage over $350,000 is usually considered a large loan.)

In most cases, borrowers who take out large loans also make down payments of more than 20%. While it may seem counterintuitive at first, these types of mortgages (called conventional loans) are actually riskier for lenders than loans with down payments of less than 20% (called high-ratio loans). That’s because high-ratio loans must be insured against default (by CMHC for example) and once they are, a lender’s potential for loss is minimized. By comparison, most conventional loans are not insured, and as such, they don’t come with similar protection. This more than offsets the fact that a conventional borrower is making a larger down payment, and to mitigate the increased risk, lenders use a sliding scale for large, conventional loans.

Let’s illustrate how sliding scales work with an example.

Assume that you buy a house for $1,400,000 and want to make a down payment of 20% of the purchase price, which in this case would be $280,000. Because you are applying for a conventional loan (i.e. a loan that is not insured against default), the lender uses a sliding scale by offering to loan you 80% of the first $750,000 of the purchase price, but only 60% of the next $650,000. This is the sliding scale at work. It is designed so that as a property’s price increases, the maximum loan amount offered decreases on a proportionate basis. In this example, while you wanted to borrow $1,120,000 (80% of the property’s value), the lender is only offering you $990,000 (71% of the property’s value) because of its sliding scale policy.

Meanwhile, if you had decided to put down only 10% of the purchase price, this same lender would have happily loaned you $1,260,000 (90% of the property’s value) because a 10% down payment would require high-ratio insurance. Good for them but not so good for you, because in this example, high-ratio insurance would cost you an additional $25,200!

Sliding scales are used by most lenders, particularly the major banks. In situations like the one above, the borrower had to choose between borrowing less than she wanted, or borrowing more and paying a substantial high-ratio insurance fee.

But fear not, because an independent mortgage planner should be able to help you avoid this conundrum. There is a subgroup of more flexible lenders who do not use a sliding scale and will loan the borrower in our example the exact $1,120,000 she seeks. While these lenders are not generally well known to consumers, experienced independent planners know them, and more importantly, know that they use a different, much cheaper form of insurance on conventional loans (called portfolio insurance), which they, not you, pay for. Borrowing from this group allows you to avoid sliding scale restrictions, and still gives you access to the best rates on offer at no added cost.

Here are a few other points to keep in mind if you are looking to borrow more than $750,000 (or $350,000 in a rural setting), regardless of your down payment amount:

  • Pay special attention to the terms and conditions that come with your mortgage, especially your prepayment penalties. Larger loan amounts magnify the differences in the penalties charged by different lenders.
  • Large loans have to be escalated up the ranks for management approval so expect lenders to take an extra day (or two) to get your approval back. If you anticipate tight timelines, get pre-approved first, which is a good move for lots of other reasons anyway.
  • While lenders are more cautious with large loans, you should still be offered the best rates in the market (they may take a bit more work, but in the long run, large loans are more profitable for lenders). If you want to know what the best rates are, shop around.

One other important point to keep in mind. When real estate prices flatten or drop, lenders can become much more conservative when underwriting higher-end real estate. As such, there can be wide disparity in the value different lenders will assign to a property. Partnering with an independent mortgage planner will help ensure that you and your property are matched with the lender who is offering the best fit for your particular situation, regardless of whether the market is hot or cold. An individual lender’s appetite for large loans may fluctuate, but to a mortgage planner at least, bigger is still always better.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for aMortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms. David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.


Housing Starts Increase In June 2011

According to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, housing starts increased in June to 197,400 units from 194,100 in May and April, and Ontario led the increase in housing starts.

The seasonally adjusted annual rate of urban starts rose 2.2 per cent to a total of 174,600 units in June, while urban single starts increased 11.1 per cent in June. Multiple urban starts dropped 3.1 per cent to a total of 103,700 units.

Housing Starts from the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

“Housing starts increased in June due to an increase in single and multiple starts in Ontario,” said the chief economist at the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s market analysis centre in a press release. “The revised numbers show that housing starts have been above their trend line since March. However, we expect housing starts to move back towards levels consistent with demographic fundamentals in the near term,” he said.

As for Toronto, the seasonally-adjusted rate of housing starts in the Toronto Census Metropolitan area jumped 23 per cent to 45,100 units. Single-detached starts rose from 8,100 in May to 14,700 in June, and multiple family starts rose 6.3 per cent to 30,400 units.

“More singles are starting thanks to some strength in pre-sales six months ago, said the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s senior market analyst for the Greater Toronto Area. “This momentum for singles should be short-lived due to the on-going challenge of a reduced supply of available lots and also some moderation in demand as interest rates begin to increase.”

More Canadian Home Buyers Taking To The Internet For Research

This week, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation released its 2011 Mortgage Consumer Survey, which polled over 3,500 people who have taken out a mortgage in the last year.

According to the survey, plenty of home buyers are taking to the internet and using search terms including mortgage options and mortgage calculators when they research mortgages. About 86 per cent of those who used the internet to research the home buying process used mortgage calculators, 56 per cent read information on mortgages and 54 per cent did a self-assemessment.

The survey also found that it took most home buyers an average of about 11 months to plan out their home buying purchase. Most home buyers, or 88 per cent, said they knew how much mortgage they could afford before they actually bought a home.

“Buying a home is one of the biggest financial decisions most Canadians will make in their lifetimes,” said Pierre Serre of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. “CMHC is committed to supporting home buyers throughout their decision making process. Through our online calculators and resources, CMHC will continue to support Canadians in the making of informed and responsible home buying decisions,” he said.

The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has many different helpful online mortgage tools and calculators you can use to determine whether you’re ready for homeownership.

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

Bridge Financing – A Solution When Buy and Sell Dates Don’t Overlap

By Dave Larock

If you want to sell your current home and use the proceeds as a down payment on a different property, what do you do if the closing dates don’t fall on the same day? More to the point, what do you do if you have to buy your new home before you sell the old one? In these cases you need a short-term loan to bridge the gap between the two transaction dates and the solution, appropriately enough, is called bridge financing. Today’s post will explain how it works for borrowers who are considering this option.
Let’s start by addressing a few common concerns: If you need a bridge loan, it does not alter or limit your ability to qualify for a mortgage in any way. Also, you don’t actually need to qualify for bridge financing itself – the only requirement is that you have an unconditional offer to purchase for the property you are selling. It is almost always offered in combination with a traditional mortgage loan – your lender simply bridges your financing gap to help facilitate the overall transaction.
Here is an example of how a bridge loan would work:

Assume you have just accepted an unconditional offer to purchase your current property on October 30. After paying off your mortgage and covering your disposition costs, you will be left with net proceeds of $180,750 (see item A).
You then buy a new property, but the sellers want you to take possession on October 12, which is 18 days before you will complete the sale of your existing home.
After making a $35,000 deposit, you decide to use $130,750 (see item B) of the net proceeds from the sale (you hold back $50,000 for closing costs and minor renovations).
You need that $130,750 on October 12, but you won’t receive it from your buyer until October 30. As such, your mortgage planner helps you secure an 18-day bridge loan at prime +3% (6% in today’s terms) at a total cost of $385 (see item C). Problem solved.
Lenders typically expect a gap of no more than 30 days between your buy and sell dates, although bridges for longer periods may be offered by some lenders on an exception basis. Because bridge loans are usually unsecured and short term, lenders charge higher rates; as in the example above, you should expect to pay somewhere in the range of prime + 3% to prime + 4%, which works out to 6% to 7% in today’s terms (some lenders will also charge an application fee of approximately $250). Keep in mind that, on balance, bridge loan rates will have far less impact on your overall financing costs than mortgage rates because they only apply on the shortfall, and they are only in place for a brief period of time.
If you have borrowing room on any existing lines of credit, most lenders will ask you to draw down these lines first, before then bridging the remaining gap. On the day you complete the purchase of your new home, you will be required to sign a Letter of Direction and Irrevocable Assignment of Funds. This is a promise to use your net sale proceeds to pay off the lender’s bridge loan before taking any money for yourself. On larger bridge loans your lender may go a step further and require that a collateral charge be registered on the property you are selling (this is a slightly more expensive step that achieves the same basic end).

While not all lenders offer bridge financing, an experienced, independent mortgage planner will have access to several who do. So instead of worrying about lining up your closing dates on the same day and trying for perfection in an imperfect world, use bridge financing as an easy and cost-effective tool when coordinating buying and selling transactions.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.

David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

Would You Save More with a Fixed or Variable-rate Mortgage? (Rate Simulator)

By Dave Larock

Mortgage rates have been on a downward march lately – five-year fixed-rate mortgages are now offered in the 3.69% range and five-year variable-rate mortgages can be had at rates as low as 2.10%. With the gap between fixed and variable rates narrowing from 2% to almost 1.5%, borrowers are revisiting the age-old fixed-vs-variable question. Today’s post will take you inside my Mortgage Rate Simulator – it’s a tool I use with my clients to run interest-rate scenarios and compare the risks and rewards of different mortgage options.

The hardest part about running rate simulations is, of course, forecasting future mortgage rates. In today’s scenarios, I’ll follow a few basic guidelines:

  • Even though most of the economic news coming from around the globe has been decidedly negative recently, I’ll assume that variable rates will do nothing but rise (if using this approach errs a little on the conservative side, then so be it).
  • I’ll spread the timing of increases out fairly evenly – but that’s really just to keep the projections simple (if my clients have specific scenarios in mind, I am happy to work with those as well).
  • My three base simulations are designed to show you when variable rates will save you money, when you’ll just about break even, and when choosing a fixed-rate mortgage will leave you better off. They will help you establish a range of comparison.
  • You will notice that I focus on rate increases over the next three years, even though we are working with five-year mortgage terms. I do this because even the best experts who forecast interest rates for a living find it almost impossible to guess what will happen four years hence.

The three simulations below will take a mortgage of $250,000, amortized over 25 years, and compare the cost of a five-year fixed rate at 3.69% to a five-year variable rate that starts at 2.10% and goes up from there. (For you fine-print readers, we have assumed that both are compounded semi-annually). Let’s also include one more wrinkle: a variable-rate borrower who decides to set her payment at the fixed rate. (This is my favourite variable-rate strategy; if you want more detail on how it works, check out my post calledThe Power of Prepayment.)

Now on to the numbers.

Variable Rate Simulation #1
We’ll start with an opening rate of 2.1% today and assume that a total of six 25 basis point (1/4 of 1%) increases will occur in March and September of 2012, 2013, and 2014. The Ending Rate in five years is 3.6%.

Central Toronto Real Estate Variable Mortgage 1

Not surprisingly, if this scenario unfolds, choosing a variable-rate mortgage today will result in a substantial saving – especially for variable-rate borrowers who set their payment using the fixed rate of 3.69%.

Now let’s see what happens if variable rates increase more quickly.

Variable Rate Simulation #2
In Simulation #2, the first 25 basis point variable-rate hike occurs early in September of 2011, followed by a steady string of increases for a total of nine over the next three years. This Ending Rate tops out at 4.6%.

Central Toronto Real Estate Variable 2

In this scenario the relative interest cost of fixed-rate vs variable-rate mortgages is about the same. Notice though that the variable-rate borrower who set her initial payment at a 3.69% still ends up with a lower balance at renewal as a result of paying more than the minimum required. This creates a small saving now that will grow much larger over time.

Finally, let’s look at a scenario where in hindsight you would have saved money by opting for a fixed rate.

Variable Rate Simulation #3
In Simulation #3, the first 25 basis point variable-rate hike occurs in September of 2011, and we see a total of 12 quarterly increases for three straight years until the variable rate tops out at the Ending Rate of 5.35%.

Central Toronto Real Estate Variable 3

Under this scenario, a fixed rate would end up saving you about $4,000 over five years. Our variable-rate borrower who set her payment at 3.69% still benefits from having used her approach, even though the variable rate only stayed below the fixed rate for two years. She has saved $500 in interest cost for banking her variable-rate savings while she could, and her total interest saved over 25 years will grow to $2,500. Using this strategy for as long as it is available will soften the potential blow if and when rates rise.

Of course, there are any number of rate scenarios to imagine, along with other comparisons that can be made between different mortgage options, such as short-term fixed vs. long-term fixed rates. Today’s post does not try to predict the future direction of mortgage rates (if you want my best guess at that, check out my Spring Mortgage Market Update). Instead, it offers different scenarios where one option proves less expensive than the other, and shows the magnitude of the difference. You may find some of the results surprising.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.

David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list.

Mortgages for Co-op and Co-ownership Properties

By Dave Larock

Co-op and co-ownership properties offer exceptional value for the right type of buyer. These buildings are usually well-located in established neighbourhoods and their units are typically much larger than today’s new-build condos, with generous principal rooms, high ceilings and multiple bedrooms. Yet demand for these types of properties is limited because of their more complex and restrictive ownership structures, and this is reflected in their comparatively bargain basement prices. Today’s post summarizes the legal differences between condominiums, co-ops and co-ownership buildings, and explains how these differences impact your mortgage financing options.

A standard condominium unit affords you the same rights of ownership as a detached house – you can buy, sell, and usually rent the unit whenever you choose, and your rights are standardized and protected by the Condominium Act of Ontario. A traditional condo has its own deed and includes a proportionate but undivided interest in common areas, such as the lobby and grounds, and these are maintained using a reserve fund which the unit owners contribute to on a regular basis. You pay your own property taxes, and you are not liable for other unit holders who do not pay theirs. This structure affords condo owners a broad and deep pool of different lenders when assessing their mortgage options.

In a co-operative ownership structure, commonly referred to as a co-op, instead of buying a specific unit and receiving a real estate deed for that unit, buyers purchase shares in a corporation that owns and manages a building. These shares come with the right to occupy a specific unit, called a leasehold interest but the ownership of the unit rests with the corporation. Each co-op is governed by its own incorporation documents, bylaws, rules and regulations, and as such, co-op owners do not enjoy the same automatic statutory protections granted to traditional condo owners in the Condominium Act. (To cite one example, co-ops are not required to have a reserve fund set aside for future repairs and maintenance, although most still do.)

Co-op owners also share more expenses, such as property tax bills, and they are indirectly liable for any bills not paid by other owners. These shared liabilities help explain why many co-ops require that their members gain board approval when buying, selling, or mortgaging their shares, or when attempting to rent out their individual units. While these constraints will be seen as a big negative to some potential buyers, others might not mind submitting to more rigorous oversight if it means that other co-op shareholders are subject to the same scrutiny and standards.

Co-ownership properties are essentially a hybrid between traditional condos and co-ops. Instead of shares in a corporation that owns the building, purchasors buy a percentage of the building’s title (think of it as buying a piece of the overall deed) and this also comes with the right to occupy a specific unit. Co-ownership regulations and by-laws are specific to each property, meaning that they too fall outside of the Condominium Act statutes. Co-ownership buildings also include shared liability for common expenses, but offer a little more overall flexibility than co-ops because they are less likely to require board approval for buying, selling, mortgaging or renting.

Both co-op and co-ownership structures make it harder and more expensive for lenders to foreclose on borrowers in the event of default. That means there is less competition for these types of loans, and as a result, the interest rates offered can vary substantially. Partnering with an experienced independent mortgage planner will help minimize additional interest-rate costs, which can range from .5% to 1%+ above the best available market rates.

Lenders will insist on a down payment of at least 30% of the purchase price for both types of properties, and because these loans demand a higher level of due diligence, they usually require an upfront administration fee of around $250 (which may be refunded if the deal falls through). Given the detailed and specific legal expertise required to execute these transactions, don’t be surprised if the lender insists that you choose from a short list of real estate lawyers that they work with on a regular basis. In these cases, the right legal specialist can save both you and the lender time and money.

Many co-op and co-ownership buildings were originally financed with blanket mortgages, and if your building has an existing blanket mortgage in place, your lender will have to agree to have their mortgage in second position. This means that in the unlikely event of total default, the blanket mortgage would be paid off first. While many of these buildings were built in the 1950s and have long since paid off their original blanket mortgages, if they haven’t, it adds another wrinkle to the process.

There is certainly more complexity involved in buying and owning a co-op or co-ownership property, but the substantially lower selling prices certainly compensate you for the inconvenience, and despite the increased potential risks of owning these types of properties, many of them are as well run today as any traditional condominium. These generally smaller buildings are often found in prime locations (example 1, example 2), they tend to have lower turnover and usually attract a more mature clientele.

There is a sub-group of potential buyers who would be surprised to learn that this combination of features can be had for a discount. If you’re part of this group and are willing to venture beyond the beaten path in search of value, co-ops and co-ownerships are well worth a look.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.

David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list