Category Archives: Mortgage Information

Mortgages for Co-op and Co-ownership Properties

By Dave Larock

Co-op and co-ownership properties offer exceptional value for the right type of buyer. These buildings are usually well-located in established neighbourhoods and their units are typically much larger than today’s new-build condos, with generous principal rooms, high ceilings and multiple bedrooms. Yet demand for these types of properties is limited because of their more complex and restrictive ownership structures, and this is reflected in their comparatively bargain basement prices. Today’s post summarizes the legal differences between condominiums, co-ops and co-ownership buildings, and explains how these differences impact your mortgage financing options.

A standard condominium unit affords you the same rights of ownership as a detached house – you can buy, sell, and usually rent the unit whenever you choose, and your rights are standardized and protected by the Condominium Act of Ontario. A traditional condo has its own deed and includes a proportionate but undivided interest in common areas, such as the lobby and grounds, and these are maintained using a reserve fund which the unit owners contribute to on a regular basis. You pay your own property taxes, and you are not liable for other unit holders who do not pay theirs. This structure affords condo owners a broad and deep pool of different lenders when assessing their mortgage options.

In a co-operative ownership structure, commonly referred to as a co-op, instead of buying a specific unit and receiving a real estate deed for that unit, buyers purchase shares in a corporation that owns and manages a building. These shares come with the right to occupy a specific unit, called a leasehold interest but the ownership of the unit rests with the corporation. Each co-op is governed by its own incorporation documents, bylaws, rules and regulations, and as such, co-op owners do not enjoy the same automatic statutory protections granted to traditional condo owners in the Condominium Act. (To cite one example, co-ops are not required to have a reserve fund set aside for future repairs and maintenance, although most still do.)

Co-op owners also share more expenses, such as property tax bills, and they are indirectly liable for any bills not paid by other owners. These shared liabilities help explain why many co-ops require that their members gain board approval when buying, selling, or mortgaging their shares, or when attempting to rent out their individual units. While these constraints will be seen as a big negative to some potential buyers, others might not mind submitting to more rigorous oversight if it means that other co-op shareholders are subject to the same scrutiny and standards.

Co-ownership properties are essentially a hybrid between traditional condos and co-ops. Instead of shares in a corporation that owns the building, purchasors buy a percentage of the building’s title (think of it as buying a piece of the overall deed) and this also comes with the right to occupy a specific unit. Co-ownership regulations and by-laws are specific to each property, meaning that they too fall outside of the Condominium Act statutes. Co-ownership buildings also include shared liability for common expenses, but offer a little more overall flexibility than co-ops because they are less likely to require board approval for buying, selling, mortgaging or renting.

Both co-op and co-ownership structures make it harder and more expensive for lenders to foreclose on borrowers in the event of default. That means there is less competition for these types of loans, and as a result, the interest rates offered can vary substantially. Partnering with an experienced independent mortgage planner will help minimize additional interest-rate costs, which can range from .5% to 1%+ above the best available market rates.

Lenders will insist on a down payment of at least 30% of the purchase price for both types of properties, and because these loans demand a higher level of due diligence, they usually require an upfront administration fee of around $250 (which may be refunded if the deal falls through). Given the detailed and specific legal expertise required to execute these transactions, don’t be surprised if the lender insists that you choose from a short list of real estate lawyers that they work with on a regular basis. In these cases, the right legal specialist can save both you and the lender time and money.

Many co-op and co-ownership buildings were originally financed with blanket mortgages, and if your building has an existing blanket mortgage in place, your lender will have to agree to have their mortgage in second position. This means that in the unlikely event of total default, the blanket mortgage would be paid off first. While many of these buildings were built in the 1950s and have long since paid off their original blanket mortgages, if they haven’t, it adds another wrinkle to the process.

There is certainly more complexity involved in buying and owning a co-op or co-ownership property, but the substantially lower selling prices certainly compensate you for the inconvenience, and despite the increased potential risks of owning these types of properties, many of them are as well run today as any traditional condominium. These generally smaller buildings are often found in prime locations (example 1, example 2), they tend to have lower turnover and usually attract a more mature clientele.

There is a sub-group of potential buyers who would be surprised to learn that this combination of features can be had for a discount. If you’re part of this group and are willing to venture beyond the beaten path in search of value, co-ops and co-ownerships are well worth a look.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.

David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

While Market Dips, High-End Toronto Real Estate Sees Best April Ever

High-end Vancouver and Toronto real estate doing fine

According to the Canadian Real Estate Association, high-end Toronto real estate saw its best April ever in 2011 while new mortgage regulations sidelined most first-time homebuyers across the country.

When compared to March 2011, April’s seasonally adjusted national home sales activity decreased by 4.4 per cent due to the mortgage regulation changes and other factors. Actual, non seasonally-adjusted national home sales activity dropped by 14.7 per cent.

Central Toronto Real Estate CREA Chart April 2011

The Canadian Real Estate Association's April 2011 Chart.

“Changes to mortgage regulations that took effect in April 2011 likely sidelined a number of first-time homebuyers,” said Canadian Real Estate Association chief economist Gregory Klump. “By contrast, higher end home sales in Greater Vancouver and Toronto had their best April ever.”

Difficult to properly compare latest Canadian real estate numbers

It’s also very important to note that last year’s April home sales were huge, and they were artificially inflated by a massive home buying rush because of the sooner-to-be-implemented new mortgage regulations, low interest rates as well as the Home Buyer Tax Credit.

“This year, additional measures to tighten mortgage rules were implemented in March and the other transitory factors were absent,” added Klump. “This makes it difficult to compare the two months in order to reliably gauge the impact of the latest round of mortgage rule changes.”

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

No New Mortgage Rules for Canadians

The Canadian real estate market has softened enough to make it no longer necessary to implement any new mortgage rules for Canadians.

According to Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, Canadian real estate markets are moving in the proper direction and the three times he’s changed mortgage rules in recent years is enough.

Minister Flaherty made his first public appearance since the recent federal election at Bloomberg’s Canada Economic Summit, stating his focus was balancing the federal budget.

The Canadian housing market has only risen since the global financial crisis, unlike the real estate markets in Europe and the United States.

Earlier this year, Minister Flaherty dropped the maximum amortization period for homeowners who were putting less than 20 per cent as a down payment to 30 years from 35 years and lowered the maximum amount homeowners could borrow when refinancing from 90 per cent to 85 per cent. In spring 2010, the government lowered the maximum amount homeowners could borrow when refinancing to 90 per cent, and the government reduced the maximum amortization period from 40 years to 35 years in 2008.

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

FIXED OR VARIABLE: a personal choice

By Jessica Magno

Mortgage rates in Canada have been at record lows the past few years, with the variable rate much lower then the fixed. Rates are slowly beginning to rise as predicted by economists and we will see an increase in both variable and fixed over the next few years.

There is a tendency for those who are currently in a variable-rate mortgage to lock in to the best five-year rate available today when we start to see an increase in the prime rate in the latter half of 2011.  At the time of writing, the prime rate was 3% and the best five-year rate mortgage was 4.05%. A recent TD Economic report suggests that prime would go up by 1% by the end of 2011 and they anticipated a further 1.5% increase by the end of 2012.  Until the U.S. and global economies start to show signs of sustained growth, the Bank of Canada will be limited in terms of how much they can raise rates – not to mention the impact on the Canadian dollar from higher rates. So there will be a slow yet steady rise of the variable rate in the next few years.

Historically in Canada, anyone who has taken the variable-rate mortgage over the fixed-rate mortgage has been further ahead 88% of the time over the last 20 to 30 years. That starts the question now that we have just come out of historically low rates as a result of the global recession – are we now in that ’12%’ period of time where it makes sense to choose a fixed rate?

At the end of the day, the numbers do not lie. Let’s assume that the prime rate in Canada will double to 6% over the next five years. I then compared a client with a $300,000 mortgage and 25-year amortization who locked in today for a five-year mortgage at 4.05 to a client who chose to float in a variable rate at prime minus 0.75%. Keep in mind, the monthly payments the same for both clients and compared where they were at the end of the five years.

The client who chose to stay floating at prime minus 0.75% over the five-year period ended up saving over $5,000, even though their interest rate at the end of the five-year term was 5.25%.

If you are looking to save the most money on interest over the next 5 years then variable is what is predicted to be the best route. It is a gamble, but given the history and the math I like to think of a variable rate mortgage as a sure bet. For those who are not the gambling type and like to sleep at night, then I always recommend the safety net of a 5 year fixed mortgage. To go fixed or variable on your mortgage is a personal choice. 

Jessica Magno is the Manager, Residential Mortgages for TD Canada Trust and is now a regular contributor to the Muddy York Real Estate Blog.  Jessica can be reached 416.880.7065 or via email at jessica.magno@td.com.

The Power Of Prepayment

By Dave Larock

Mortgage debt can be intimidating; it is a massive personal liability that typically takes decades to pay off. During the early years of a loan, it can be downright depressing to see how much of a scheduled payment is used to cover the cost of interest, and how little of each payment actually goes towards reducing principal. Not surprisingly, when their mountain of debt is at its highest point, borrowers don’t seem motivated to accelerate their rate of repayment, while conversely, borrowers who have only a few years left on their mortgage are willing to make a lot of extra sacrifices to shorten the time it will take to become mortgage free. While human nature has most of us picking up the pace only when the finish line is in sight, in today’s post I’ll run some basic numbers to show you why the best bang for your extra payment buck is in the early years of your mortgage. Then, once you see the benefit of chipping away early, I’ll offer some strategies on the best way to go about doing this and close with a special tip for variable-rate mortgage borrowers.

To keep the math simple, let’s assume that you have borrowed $250,000 at an interest rate of 5%, and that your mortgage is being amortized over 25 years. (Note: your amortization period tells you how long it would take to pay off your entire mortgage if your interest rate stays the same, and if you make only your regular, contractual  payments.)We’ll then assume that you add one additional payment of $100 at different times over the life of your loan and calculate how much interest you will save depending on when you do this.

Central Toronto Real Estate Dave Larock Prepayment Chart

Mortgage Pre-Payment Chart by Dave Larock. Click for full size.

The chart on the left shows what happens if you make that extra payment in the first month, the sixtieth month, the one-hundred and twentieth month etc., and the blue bars show how much interest that extra payment will save you over the life of your loan. As you can see, making that extra payment early saves you much more in the long run (interest savings by paying in the first month = $242.21, interest savings in month 240 = $27.98).

So if you’re a first-time home buyer who sees the wisdom in making extra payments on your mortgage, what is the best way to set this up? Many well-intentioned borrowers plan to make extra payments periodically, when they have surplus cash available, rather than scheduling to have an extra payment taken regularly by their lender. The only problem with this approach is that it almost never works. If you’re like most people, you will always find some excuse for spending the extra cash, so realistically, the only way to ensure that you follow through with the extra payments is to make them automatically. You have two options for doing this:

Option One – Set your payment above the minimum required by the lender on Day One. Once the overpayment is built into your mortgage contract, it’s difficult to undo so you’re essentially forcing yourself to meet this obligation.

Option Two –Schedule your lender to take a separate, extra payment from your account at the same time that they collect your regular payment. The advantage of this approach is that, if your circumstances change, you can adjust the additional payment more easily than in Option One, because it is not baked into the terms of your contract.

When you’re deciding how much extra you want to pay, try to stick with an amount that you know you can comfortably manage. (To see what the impact of making extra payments looks like, check out my mortgage payment calculator.) If you’re in a variable-rate mortgage, I would advise you to bank the interest-rate savings you enjoy today by setting your variable payment at the level you would have been paying if you had chosen the current fixed rate. Here’s how it works.

Bank the Savings – Tip for Variable-rate Mortgage Borrowers

Let’s use an example to illustrate:

Assume that you have a $250,000 mortgage to be amortized over 25 years. You choose a five-year variable-rate mortgage currently priced at 2.15%, which makes your monthly payment $1,077. Also assume that you could have had a five-year fixed-rate mortgage at 4% with a monthly payment of $1,315.

Instead of paying $1,077/month, you decide to set your payment at $1,315/month (which is the equivalent fixed-rate payment). This means you are making an extra payment of $238 each month ($1,315 – $1,077 = $238) for as long as your variable rate stays at 2.15%.

Here is what that does for you:

  • An extra payment of $238/month for five years will have reduced your principal by an extra $15,000 at the end of the first five years when your mortgage comes up for renewal, and will save you about $8,400 in interest over the life of your loan.
  • Your monthly mortgage payment will not increase until your current 2.15% rate rises above 4% (because your payment was set at 4% to begin with). This gives you more payment predictability than if you were only paying the minimum amount. In this way, you are benefiting from some of the protection you would have had if you had chosen the fixed rate.  It’s a good compromise.

The best part is, every variable-rate mortgage holder can afford to do this. I know because the only way to get a variable rate today is to prove to your lender that you can afford to pay a rate of between 4.55% and 5.69% (which is called the Mortgage Qualifying Rate). As such, setting your mortgage payment based on a rate of only 4% should be a snap!

If you’re a first-time home buyer, you may feel like it’ll take forever to pay off your mortgage. But like the power of water dripping on a stone, a little extra prepayment, especially if you start early in your mortgage’s life cycle, can dramatically shorten the amount of time it will take you to become mortgage free.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.

David’s website is www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

How Much Home Can You Afford?

Calculating home buying costs for Canadians

There are a number of formulas and calculators out there to help younger and first-time homebuyers determine how much they can afford to spend on a home.

Your income, current debts, monthly payments for your current debts, housing-related costs, closing and one-time costs along with current spending processes are all factors to consider. And when that’s all said and done, there still needs to be money for food, furniture, other expenses, fun, savings and emergencies.

The two big calculations lenders will look at are your Gross Debt Service Ratio (GDS) and your Total Debt Service Ratio (TDS).

Gross Debt Service Ratio

This calculation considers your income, monthly payments and housing-related costs such as taxes and insurance. A Gross Debt Service Ratio calculator is available here.

You want this number to be under 30% to 32%.

Total Debt Service Ratio

This calculation takes into account your monthly housing costs, credit cards and other liabilities like car loans, as well as your gross monthly income. A Total Debt Service Ratio Calculator is available here.

You want this number to be less than between 37% and 40%.

The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has a great calculator and worksheet for Canadian home buyers who want to know how much they can afford and what to expect to pay for a home along with all of the little “extras” many people tend to forget about here: Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Homebuying Calculator. Alternative GDS and TDS ratio calculators are also available at the above link.

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

The Huge Hidden Cost in Most Canadian Mortgages and How to Easily Avoid It

By David Larock

If Canadians shopped for cars the same way we shop for mortgages, most of us would be driving around in old beaters that would be better used as lawn ornaments. That’s because all of our focus would be on price (interest rate), and not on potential repair costs (interest rate penalties). If choosing a car based solely on its purchase price seems short-sighted to most of us, why do we make this mistake with mortgages? It’s probably because most people just don’t think they will need to break their mortgage contract early. But with so many variables – such as job transfers, an expanding family, an inheritance, the chance to buy your dream home, divorce, job loss – can you ever really be sure?

If you do need to pay out your fixed-rate mortgage early, you may be shocked when you see the penalty charged by your lender, and even more so when you realize that you could have avoided most of that cost by simply choosing another lender offering the same interest rate. Today’s post will use four different hypothetical borrowers to compare how fixed-rate mortgage penalties are calculated. In each case, we’ll figure out the extra penalty charged by some lenders, and then calculate the reduction in their interest rate necessary to make the overall cost of their mortgage equivalent to the cost of borrowing from other lenders who use more reasonable penalty calculations. (If that sounds confusing, fear not. It’ll become clearer when I show you the numbers.)

First, let’s understand the different ways that lenders calculate fixed-rate mortgage penalties. In your mortgage contract, it will say something like “your penalty will be calculated as the greater of 3 months’ interest or the Interest Rate Differential (IRD)”. Alas, in the majority of cases, your penalty will be based on the dreaded IRD calculation. In principle, the lender calculates the IRD by taking your interest rate and comparing it to the interest rate they currently offer for whatever term most closely matches the time remaining on your mortgage:

For example, if you have a five-year mortgage at 5% with three years remaining, and the lender’s current three-year rate is 3%, some lenders will take 5% minus 3% = 2%.

This number is then multiplied by your mortgage amount and then multiplied again by the time you have left on your mortgage, divided by 12:

Using a $100,000 mortgage, the penalty would be 2% x $100,000 x (36/12) = $6,000.

But here is where the shenanigans start. If your mortgage is from a lender who uses posted rates (we’ll call this group the “Big Five”), they won’t use your actual mortgage rate. Instead, they’ll use their higher “posted rate” that was in effect at the time you got your mortgage. (So that’s what posted rates are for!) That means your actual 5% rate will be arbitrarily increased by 1.4% to approximately 6.4% for this penalty calculation. What’s more, that same 1.4% is then also applied to the comparison rate on the term that most closely matches the time remaining on your mortgage. Here is what that does to your penalty:

6.4% - 2.95% = 3.45%           then      3.45% x $100,000 x (36/12) = $10,350

I know. Ouch. While the original headline interest rate offered by the two different lenders was the same, the difference in penalties charged was $4,350 on a $100,000 loan. That’s 4.35% of the original amount borrowed! In a minute I’m going to explain why this difference in penalties will be even more pronounced if fixed rates start to rise; but first, let’s look at some more examples.

In the chart below, for the original rates, I used the Bank of Canada’s average five-year posted conventional mortgage rate for the appropriate month and year, and subtracted 1.42%, which a recent Bank of Canada report indicated is the long-term historical average discount offered on posted rates. I used the same interest rates for both lender groups and I used this Monday’s mortgage rates (April 4, 2011) to calculate the appropriate comparison rates (for a more detailed breakdown of my calculations, see myPenalty Worksheet).

This gives you a very close estimate of what your penalty would be today, if you had these rates and mortgage balances, and the same number of months remaining on your mortgage.
Once you have regained consciousness, I will direct your attention to the two penalties that comewith an asterisk (*). In both of these cases, the borrower’s mortgage rate was close enough to current rates that the Some Other Lenders group charged a penalty of only three months’ interest instead of the IRD. By contrast, by the time the Big Five lenders had grossed up the contract rate by 1.42% and reduced the comparison rate by the same amount, their IRD penalty was still alive and well. This is significant because if rates start to rise, Big Five borrowers will in many cases still be paying huge IRD penalties, while the Some Other Lender borrowers will only be charged three months’ interest. Look at the difference in the bottom line. Shocking, no?

So what is the difference in the IRD penalty calculations worth to the four fixed-rate mortgage borrowers in the examples above? Since they could have secured the same upfront interest rate from either group, the only difference in their relative borrowing costs is the extra penalty they had to pay the Big Five. Now for the fun part.

I wanted to figure out by how much the Big Five would have to drop their interest rates to make the cost of borrowing offered by them (rate + penalty), equivalent to the cost of borrowing offered by the Some Other Lenders group. The table on the left shows the analysis, and no, the negative rate in the fourth example is not an error. The difference in the penalty charged by the Big Five on this mortgage is so large that they would have to PAY this borrower an interest rate of .39% to make an equivalent offer! And if interest rates start to rise, this borrower’s profile (an interest rate at or even a little below today’s rates), will look an awful lot like the profiles of people who are considering fixed-rate mortgages today.

The saddest part is that I really shouldn’t have to be writing this post. The Big Five do not have to disclose their method of calculating mortgage penalties. If they did, borrowers would better understand the huge risk of higher penalties they face and would aggressively look for alternatives. I even wrote a post earlier this year imploring Finance Minister Flaherty to follow-up on his 2010 budget promise and address this issue. Unfortunately, nothing has been done to date, so it falls to the blogosphere to level the playing field.

If you’re among the two-thirds of Canadian borrowers who opt for a five-year fixed-rate mortgage each year, what is this difference in the way mortgage penalties are calculated worth to you? For the four borrowers in my example, the additional rate discount required to make the Big Five’s cost of borrowing equivalent to the cost of borrowing offered by the Some Other Lenders group starts at .44% and goes up to a whopping 4.46%. Those numb

ers tell us that even if you’re still convinced that you won’t end up having to break your fixed-rate mortgage early, you should think twice before betting thousands of extra dollars in mortgage penalties that you’re going to be right. To revisit a familiar theme, you don’t expect your house to burn down but you still pay for fire insurance. Insuring against outrageous penalties on your mortgage can be free – you just have to choose the right lender

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. David’s website is located at www.integratedmortgageplanners.com

This site is owned & operated by: Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd Johnston & Daniel Division,477 Mount Pleasant Road, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 2L9, 416.489.2121. The content is provided by a number of sources as referenced in the contribution list

The Best Mortgage Rate No One Is Talking About

The Best Mortgage Rate No One is Talking About

By: David Larock

Fixed-rate mortgages offer borrowers predictability and peace-of-mind in exchange for higher initial borrowing costs (over the longer term, the total cost can be more or less depending on what happens to mortgage rates). Really, fixed-rate mortgages act as a form of ‘rate insurance’; and just as with other forms of insurance, both the coverage you get and the cost of the premium you pay have to be weighed when determining your best option. Most Canadian fixed-rate borrowers almost always choose a five-year term, but that instinctive response may not be the best choice – particularly in today’s environment. Today’s post will get to the root of why people choose fixed rates, and offer a little-known insight on where the real value in today’s fixed-rate mortgage terms can be found.

In my blog post called Fixed or Variable? The Question People Love to Ask, I wrote that a borrower’s decision about whether to choose a fixed or variable rate was fundamentally a ranking of their sense of fear versus their instinct toward greed. While conservative borrowers prioritize protection over savings, most of the people I talk to don’t necessarily think they are giving up one to get the other. Deep down, they also believe that choosing a fixed rate will save them money in the long run. In today’s environment, if their fixed term is ten years rather than five years, they could well be right.

Today, the belief that fixed rates will prove cheaper in the end is most commonly based on the view that governments will continue to print money until they inflate their way out of debt. Higher inflation will also increase tax revenues, so from a government’s perspective, what’s not to like? The only real problem for people who subscribe to this view of the future is timing, because over the short term, disinflation seems just as likely as inflation: most of the printed monies have yet to start circulating in their economies; governments and consumers are trying to reduce spending en masse; and we are seeing considerable slack in the economies of most of the developed world.

So if you think inflation (and not the mild kind) lurks around some future corner, how long should you lock in your rate to best protect against this risk? While the majority of borrowers opt for a five-year fixed-rate mortgage, I think the real interest-rate protection they offer is limited. After all, if it takes three years for inflation to kick in, you will have paid a premium for five years’ worth of rate insurance that in reality gave you only two years’ worth of protection. Worse still, at the end of that two-year period, you have to renew your mortgage in a rising rate environment, which is not very different from having to change ships in the middle of a storm. Based on that, locking in for a longer term (which makes the timing of rate increases less of an issue) is worth considering if it can be done at reasonable cost.

In a more stable economic environment, the cost of adding a second five years of protection to your mortgage term can be around 1.5%, which in my opinion, is expensive. But today, the market for five-year fixed-rate mortgages is at 3.89%, and I can secure a ten-year fixed-rate mortgage for 4.79% – a premium of only .9%. Today’s pricing regime makes the coverage/cost trade-off offered by a ten-year fixed-rate term much more compelling. Looking at it another way, if you think the five-year fixed rate will be higher than 5.69% in five years, you should consider the ten-year option. The bottom line is that in today’s environment, the second five years of protection is likely to be far more valuable than the first five years.

Many borrowers dismiss longer fixed-rate terms because they assume that the payout penalties are prohibitive. While it’s true that breaking a ten-year mortgage in the first five years would trigger a huge payout penalty (although taking advantage of pre-payment privileges would not), the Interest Rate Act mandates that after five years, lenders can only charge a payout penalty of three months of interest. So you’re effectively getting the option of keeping your rate for a second five-year period, and it will cost you three months of interest if you choose not to exercise it.

If you move to another property of equal or greater value, in many cases you can also take your mortgage with you (subject to lender approval). This flexibility comes as a surprise to many people and can be of considerable value if you are enjoying a below-market rate.

When ten-year money gets this cheap, it can also appeal to less conservative groups who want to bet on future inflation, such as landlords who hope to match below-market funding costs with higher, inflation driven rents. Even regular home owners can offer prospective buyers the option of assuming their below-market mortgage as an inducement when selling their home (assuming the buyers are approved by the lender). It may sound far-fetched but we’ve seen periods like this before, and interest rates have tended to fluctuate widely over the long run.

I still like the savings offered by a variable-rate mortgage for borrowers who are comfortable with risk and can afford higher payments, but I think that conservative borrowers can find much more fixed-rate value in today’s ten-year rate versus the banker’s favourite five-year rate.

There are also ways to hedge your bets with a ten-year mortgage. If you have built up equity of more than 20% in your property, you can combine your mortgage with a line of credit priced at a floating rate. If your call on rates turns out to be wrong, and inflation stays low for an extended period, you can use your prepayment privileges to convert your fixed-rate debt over to your

cheaper, floating rate line-of-credit debt. Over time, this can average your borrowing costs down closer to prevailing rates. If protection is your primary motivation, even though you may be wrong on the future direction of rates, the expense can still be justified.

After all, it’s not as though you buy fire insurance and then complain that your house didn’t burn down if you don’t end up needing it.

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. David’s website is located atwww.integratedmortgageplanners.com

Canadian Homeowners Confident About Their Mortgages

Canadian Homeowners Confident About Their Mortgages

The results of an RBC poll released this week say that Canadians believe the housing market is more balanced and they are confident in their mortgages and buying a home.

- 90% of Canadians believe Canadian real estate is a good investment.

- 85% of Canadians are doing a great job of paying down their mortgages.

- 73% of Canadians believe their family would be fine during a housing drop.

“Canadians believe in the long-term benefits of owning a home including the value it can provide, both personally and as a long-term investment,” said the report. “Last year’s survey showed that people were looking to buy ahead of rising costs. This year marks a return to more normal levels or purchase intentions and recent housing data reflects this move to a more balanced market.”

- 29% of Canadians say it is likely they will purchase a home in the next two years, which is only two percentage points down from 2010.

- 55% of Canadians say it’s best to buy now, with 57% planning on buying within 18 to 24 months and 24% planning on buying within 12 months.

- 45% of Canadians say it’s best to wait to buy.

“There’s a lot more to owning a home than just the price, as taxes, fees and repairs can quickly add up. Online tools and calculators along with the advice of a mortgage advisor can help you be prepared for the costs while also looking at which payment features fit your financial plan,” said RBC.